1 Chronicles 3:1-24
This commit is contained in:
		
							parent
							
								
									b3da146321
								
							
						
					
					
						commit
						b264332340
					
				
					 1 changed files with 41 additions and 0 deletions
				
			
		
							
								
								
									
										41
									
								
								content/bible_journal/1chronicles_3:1-24.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							
							
						
						
									
										41
									
								
								content/bible_journal/1chronicles_3:1-24.md
									
										
									
									
									
										Normal file
									
								
							|  | @ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||||||
|  | +++ | ||||||
|  | title = "1 Chronicles 3:1–24" | ||||||
|  | date = "2023-09-04" | ||||||
|  | +++ | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | ### [Read the passage.](https://biblia.com/bible/esv/1Chronicles3.1-24) | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | The descendants of Judah have been listed, up to the generation of David, more | ||||||
|  | or less. Now the focus zooms in on the line of the kings. First, David's sons | ||||||
|  | are listed, arranged by their birthplace and their mothers. Bath-shua's (that | ||||||
|  | is, Bathsheba) sons are not listed in birth order, as Solomon is the second of | ||||||
|  | her son's mentioned in 2 Samuel (and the only one named). Her first died due to | ||||||
|  | the judgement on David's sin concerning her husband Uriah. Most of David's | ||||||
|  | children are not mentioned elsewhere, but the ones that are don't have | ||||||
|  | well-known stories for good reasons. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | From here, brothers and sisters are not mentioned as the genealogy follows | ||||||
|  | direct descent from Solomon to Josiah. After Josiah, the kingdom of Judah does | ||||||
|  | not pass cleanly from father to son because of foreign influence, from both | ||||||
|  | Egypt and Babylon. A king would be deposed and his brother set up in his place, | ||||||
|  | or his uncle in some cases. Eventually Judah is fully conquered and the royal | ||||||
|  | family is taken captive while Jeconiah (a.k.a. Jehoiachin in 2 Kings) was king. | ||||||
|  | This genealogy establishes that Zerubbabel is in the line of David. This | ||||||
|  | Zerubbabel was the leader of the exiles who returned to rebuild Jerusalem. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | There seems to be some debate about whether the families listed in verses 21 to | ||||||
|  | 24 are desendend from each other or are other Davidic families contemporary | ||||||
|  | with Zerubbabel. The impetus for this view is an early date for the text, close | ||||||
|  | to the time of Zerubbabel's life. This seems too much like _eisegesis_ to me, | ||||||
|  | imposing a meaning onto the text, when what we want to be doing is _exegesis_, | ||||||
|  | extracting meaning out of the text. This text lists the sons of a father, picks | ||||||
|  | one of those sons and names his sons, over and over. I believe there is still | ||||||
|  | enough time between the return of the exiles and the reconstruction of the | ||||||
|  | temple and the proposed date of the compilation of Ezra-Nehemiah (they were | ||||||
|  | originally one book) for the author of 1 Chronicles to know about 6 generations | ||||||
|  | after Zerubbabel and also be Ezra himself. The Chronicler wasn't necessarily | ||||||
|  | Ezra either, but that is the tradition. | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | * * * | ||||||
|  | 
 | ||||||
|  | Your words are true forever. | ||||||
		Loading…
	
	Add table
		Add a link
		
	
		Reference in a new issue